view our video
canadian clients
U.S. clients
seminars
carrier PARS, ACROSS tracking
carrier PAPS tracking
partners in protection
canada plus
CTPAT
Cortez

Customs Reporter.

A Bulletin on Customs and International Trade from Russell A. Farrow Limited - Spring 1999.

Citt Decisions.

Liquid Paper Dispensers

Issue: Whether Liquid Paper Dryline adhesive dispensers with cartridge (and refill cartridges) and Liquid Paper Dryline correction film dispensers with cartridge (and refill cartridges) should be classified, respectively with glues or adhesives, less thwhiteout.jpg (5048 bytes)an 1 kg, put up for retail sale -3506.10.00- and other chemical preparations not elsewhere specified -3823.90.90- or should be classified as mechanical appliances for projecting, dispersing or spraying liquids or powders -8424.89.00.
Result: Dismissed. The Tribunal acknowledges that the dispensers may be considered "mechanical appliances" based on the broad definition set out in Supplementary Notes to Section XVI. However, heading No. 84.24 refers to "[m]echanical appliances...for projecting dispersing or spraying liquids or powders." While the dispensers "dispense" either correction film or adhesive this action does not constituteprojecting,dispersing orspraying as contemplated by the terms of heading No. 84.24. Of the three terms,dispensing most closely describes the action of the dispensers and, yet, the verbto disperse means togo, send, drive, or distribute in different directions over a wide area. It is clear, in the Tribunals view, that the dispensing of correction film or adhesive by the dispensers does not meet this description.

Caulking Guns

Issue: Whether caulking guns should be classified under 8205.59.90 as "other hand tools, not elsewhere specified, of base metal" or as "spray guns and similar appliances" of 8424.20.90. Alternatively, whether the caulking guns should be classified as "other machines and mechanical appliances having individual functions not elsewhere specified" - 8479.89.90
Result: Dismissed. The tribunal could not find that the caulking guns gave a jet or divergent spray, important features in the description of spray guns and similar appliances. Further, grease guns, which in many ways operate in a similar manner to caulking guns are excluded from 84.24. There was no compelling evidence that the goods were machines or mechanical appliances having individual functions. Note 1 to Chapter 82 requires hand tools to have a blade, working edge, working surface or other working part of base metal. The Tribunal was satisfied that the plunger in the caulking gun constituted a working part.

Beauty Product Sets

Issue: Whether Oscar de la Renta beauty product sets should be classed as "perfumes and toilet waters" of 3303.00.00 or according to General Interpretive Rule 3c under the tariff item occurring last in numerical order among those for the various components compparfum.jpg (4324 bytes)rising each of the two sets, specifically 3307.30.00 and 3304.99.00.

Result: Dismissed. The Tribunal was of the view that the goods could be classified according to General Interpretive Rule 3b according to the component from each set which confers on the set as a whole its essential character. The sets were a fragrance collection. Having regard to the concentration of fragrance in each of the components and their relative value, the Tribunal concluded that the perfume and eau de toilette provide essential character in the two sets.

Don't Get Dumped On!
Due to the financial crisis in Asia, Russia and South America there is a worldwide glut of semi-manufactured steel products. As orders dry up, foreign steel manufacturers are looking to sell their stockpiles at almost any price they can get. This is resulting in the dumping of steel products into the Canadian market. Dumping occurs when goods are sold for export at prices lower than in their home market or sold at a loss.
While this may be an attractive situation for importers it is damaging Canadian producers of steel products. Consequently, these domestic producers have appealed to the government for protection against these foreign steelmakers. As a result the government is establishing normal values on a wide variety of semi-manufactured steel products from a range of countries.
So far the result is that anti-dumping duties may apply to:
  • Flat hot-rolled steel plate and sheet originating in or exported from Italy, Korea, Spain, Mexico, China, South Africa, Russia, France, Romania, the Slovak Republic and the Ukraine;
  • Cold-rolled sheet steel originating in or exported from Argentina, Belgium, New Zealand, Russia, the Slovak Republic, Spain and Turkey;
  • Corrosion-resistant sheet steel for motor vehicle body components originating in or exported from Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, the U.K, and the U.S.;
  • Stainless steel round bar originating in or exported from Korea, Germany, France, India, Italy, Japan, Spain, Sweden Taiwan and the U.K.
The dumping duties are quite substantial, ranging from 42% to 155% of the value of the product. Not an easy pill to swallow if you are hit retroactively with an assessment. Importers should check with their Customs Broker before placing orders for these products to see if anti-dumping duty applies.
Click here to return to the top of the pageback to top

Click here to go to the previous page.

Page [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ]

Customs Reporter Home Page

HomeAbout UsServicesWhat's NewLocationsLinksFeedback

Customs Reporter © 1999 Russell A. Farrow Ltd.